Supreme Court Database

Search

Decision Direction Dissent

Decision Direction Dissent
Variable Name
Spaeth Name
Normalizations
decisionDirectionDissent
DIRD
2 [ view ]

Once in a great while the majority as well as the dissenting opinion in a case will both support or, conversely, oppose the issue to which the case pertains. For example, the majority and the dissent may both assert that the rights of a person accused of crime have been violated. The only difference between them is that the majority votes to reverse the accused’s conviction and remand the case for a new trial, while the dissent holds that the accused’s conviction should be reversed, period. In such cases, the entry in the decisionDirection variable should be determined relative to whether the majority or the dissent more substantially supported the issue to which the case pertains, and an entry should appear in this variable. In the foregoing example, the direction of decision variable (decisionDirection) should show a 0(conservative) because the majority provided the person accused of crime with less relief than does the dissent, and direction based on dissent should show a 1 (liberal) The person accused of crime actually won the case, but won less of a victory than the dissent would have provided.

Values:

0dissent in opposite direction
1majority and dissent in same direction